ENG 1302
Research Analysis Rough Draft Peer-Edit
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • My Dashboard
  • ENG 1302
  • Assignments
  • Research Analysis Rough Draft Peer-Edit
2020 - Spring
  • Home
  • Google Drive
  • Modules
  • McGraw Hill Textbooks
  • Lucid (Whiteboard)

Research Analysis Rough Draft Peer-Edit

  • Due Apr 15, 2020 by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting on paper
  • Available Apr 13, 2020 at 12am - Apr 24, 2020 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Apr 24, 2020 at 11:59pm.

On Wednesday, your rough draft of your research analysis is due.  On Wednesday, everyone will send their rough drafts to me via email.  Next, I want everyone send their paper to a chosen person to peer-edit and revise.  I have attached the checklist below.  I know that this is different, but you may highlight and comment to edit.  All should be familiar with it, as I have used this on papers shared between us.  If anyone needs help, please let me know.  You will be receiving a daily grade for this activity.  I will be looking on the documents shared to monitor activity.

Peer edit/Revision Checklist for Research Analysis

_________ Does the introduction capture the reader’s attention?

_________ Does the introduction explain the issue/topic and the sides involved?  It is acceptable to have a paragraph of background information after the introduction if desired and well done.

_________ Does the introduction indicate the position on the issue/topic to be taken, i.e. the thesis?

_________ Is the body of the paper organized into multiple paragraphs that address various points on the issue/topic? 

_________ Does the paper put the sources in conversation with one another?  _________ Are the voices of the sources apparent?  Is the voice of the author of the paper apparent?  In other words, does the reader easily follow the conversations of the sources?

_________ Is the conclusion effective?  Does it address the implications and if desired, use a call to action?

_________ At the end of the paper, does the reader better understand the issue being analyzed and the different perspectives presented?

_________ Has the thesis been met?

_________ Have direct quotations, as well as summarized and paraphrased information been properly parenthetically cited?  Remember, if the sources have page numbers, they must be used in the citation.

_________ Is there a Works Cited?

_________ Is the heading double-spaced and on the first page only?

_________ Is the title relevant to the topic and centered under the heading?

_________ Are the page numbers in the top right corners of each page?

_________ Is the entire paper double-spaced and 12 pt. font?

_________ If direct quotations over 4 typed lines have been used, have they been properly blocked and cited?

_________ Is the Works Cited properly formatted?

_________ Check the paper for errors in sentence structure.  Are there run-on sentences?  Are there sentence fragments? 

_________ Check the paper for misspelled words, grammar/usage errors, and punctuation errors.

_________ The paper should be written for a well-informed academic audience.  Has the writer remained in third person?  Check for contractions and eliminate.  Check for slang and informal language and eliminate.

_________ Besides checking for errors, make suggestions to improve the paper.  These suggestions may concern word choice, transitions to help the flow of ideas, or improving unclear areas in the paper. 

 

Signature _____________________________________________ Date ___________

1587013199 04/15/2020 11:59pm
Please include a description
Additional Comments:
Rating max score to > pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Find a Rubric
Find Rubric
Please include a title
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit rating Delete rating
0 to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 5 out of 5